On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > We can't agree to disagree in this case, not if you seriously think that > this is an attack. Would you continue to interpret such vague events as > attacks? You gave it as an example after all.
You can use the example from May 2016 if you wish. It's just an example, and not the point, which is wider. What does it matter how *I* specifically interpret a attack? I am not the judge, jury, and executioner. One of the points of a CoC is to have more than one person review a supposed incident, instead of this incessant bickering we have all come to love. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
