On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:25 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the issue is not the lack of clear enforcement rules, but a lack > of a proactive enforcer, be it a person or a body. The CoC has done > nothing but give people something to say when they want to be passive > aggressive in a discussion. > Changing it to a more strict one like Videolan's will not affect that. > > This lack of interest you mentioned is exactly the issue. If it all > depends on the coordinated action and involvement of a dozen or so > developers, then nothing will happen. As i said, the one time action was > called for a developer's behavior, no voter showed up.
So how does one fix a toxic environment where most of the members don't care, or don't even aknowledge it's an issue? Let it hemmorage people, keeping a few here and there who can "take it" (which IMO is a load of gross gatekeeping BS)? (Yes, As far as I'm concerned, staying away / not replying / doing nothing si just an implicit way of saying "I'm fine with the community as it is". ) I actually don't have much of a solution to the "nobody willing to step up" problem, though, no. The offical documents should at least reflect that reality then, though. A CoC that is ignored, is not a CoC. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel