Thilo Borgmann (12020-03-26): > Let's look at this. There are two things here: > > a) Is it a good enough solution of the qualfification task Paul has > given to Ashutosh? > > b) Is it unsuitable to apply? Well that might be but we need to get > clear about a) for the sake of GSoC. > > Also, a) & b) might be a reoccuring problem this year, as IIRC Jai > also gave a qualification tasks that might be on its own useless to > apply to git HEAD. But AFAIKT this is not on devel by now. So please > let's concentrate on these two questions. Any thoughts appreciated.
The original proposal for a tone audio source was from me, more than a year ago. It was for testing purposes: to be able to feed filters and codecs realistic input without relying on external files. For that, it would have been completely internal and bit-exact. Now, there is a new proposal. Without looking into it closer, I supposed it was based on the same goal: testing. Apparently not. But I have not seen that discussed on the list. I have no objection to the task if it serves a purpose. But it has nothing to do with my original proposal and this version, using an external library, would be worthless for testing. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
