Am 26.03.20 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas George: > Thilo Borgmann (12020-03-26): >> Ok. So if I understand all of this correctly, the overall goal of the >> tones project is already redundant to your old proposal (or at least >> partially, Paul?). > > I do not know what the overall goal of the tones project is: I have not > seen it discussed on the list.
I strongly agree we should more thoroughly review future project proposals. The questions about validity/usefullness raised here should have been settled before it goes online for students to select. >> Has there been any reason why it never made it into git HEAD? > > It was just a vague proposal, not actual code. > >> So for this patch as-is, AFAICT Paul wanted the external lib as >> qualification task only and finally get things natively implemented >> during GSoC? > > I don't know what Paul wanted, I have not seen it discussed on the list. > >> And then, it would of course only make sense to do this project based >> on what Nicolas old proposal was. Assuming it served the same goal. That was basically my misunderstanding of the topic. Paul wants a tone/music generator utilizing fluidsynth, not just as part of qualification as I understood it. And after talking to Nicolas, he is fine continuing that GSoC project as intended. @Ashutosh: So please continue working on your project/application with Paul as planned. Time to give some actual feedback on the code / review, please. Thanks, Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".