Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]> added the comment:
No, Chroma was listed originally because its license was not LGPL-compatible, and it is still listed, because you don't even try to completely fulfil section 4 of the LGPL. Note that I am not a native speaker and may well misunderstand the meaning of the word "accompany", but since the same word exists in German (and French) and you did not try to convince me that you are "accompanying" the binary with the source (at least in some way), I doubt that is the case. (To help you understand the issue: The word has something to do with "hand in hand" - I wonder if you would argue that, on your website, the download references for source and binary go "hand in hand".) ____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue726> ____________________________________________________
