Roine Gustafsson <[email protected]> added the comment: The intent of the quoted paragraph (msg4396) is to assert that the license only covers Chroma and that anything the user does with libavcodec falls outside of the Chroma license.
Your quoted paragraph from LGPL suggests we should clarify the allowance for substituting libavcodec and debugging of the modification. This was always the intent, but we'll amend the license to be more explicit. ____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue726> ____________________________________________________
