Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> added the comment: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 05:06:22AM +0000, Alex Converse wrote: > > Alex Converse <[email protected]> added the comment: > > > You are quoting from (L)GPL version 3, this is not the version that > > applies here... > > Dumb question. Why can't he choose to use version 3? Isn't that what the > "--enable-version3" configure flag is all about? Is there something in this > mess > that sticks us on GPLv2-only?
I don't know if all the other libraries involved here are v3-compatible. If we hypothetically assume that they are, then yes, the license could be upgraded. But this is not what happened here. Furthermore, all versions are being violated in this case. ____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue820> ____________________________________________________
