2016-08-20 12:08 GMT+02:00 Erik Dobberkau <[email protected]>: > 2016-08-19 10:35 GMT+02:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]>: >> > Am 18.08.2016 um 11:06 schrieb Erik Dobberkau <[email protected] >> > It seems for H.264 encoded *interlaced* video the frame rate displayed by >> > ffprobe -show_streams -i [inputfile] >> > is still twice the actual frame rate >> >> I don't think this is generally correct but please feel free to provide a >> sample. > > please find a test sample at > https://www.dropbox.com/s/lzb31bw9iymgg8e/H264_1080i.mp4
I believe there is an issue, I opened ticket #5794. There are at least two reasons why your above assumption is not generally correct: There are two ways to do interlaced encoding for h264 (paff and mbaff), the - quality-wise - best h264 encoder only supports mbaff and the issue you see is most likely paff-related. I usually see paff-encoded material in mpegts (how did you record the sample?) and for mpegts, the correct 25fps are shown. Thank you for the sample, Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
