Am 21.11.2016 um 22:54 schrieb Toerless Eckert:
I thought the bosch/mercedes example was fitting. I was under the
impression that fmpeg exists because users are sick and tired of
dealing with the variety of components individually. What was this heap of
software packages from doom9 15 years ago to encode media, can't quite
remember
thats's all fine - but why do you think ffmpeg is using a ton of
libraries for a ton of special tasks? becaus enobody can be a expert for
all the video related stuff at one
so when you have a *specific* question aks at the *specific project*
you can try it here - maybe you get a answer - but if you get "that's
not ffmpeg" just suck it instead play silly "i didn't know that my apple
did not grow at the same three as my orange"
what is there to discuss?
ffmpeg != x264 != glibc != gcc != nss != random library
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
