Oh, haha. Yes, so it was pretty much what I was getting out of it, just the wording threw me off.
Thanks for clearing it up! ________________________________________ Von: ffmpeg-user <ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org> im Auftrag von Kieran O Leary <kieran.o.le...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. September 2017 14:56 An: FFmpeg user questions Betreff: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Matroska Container, FFV1 Codec and GPU Encoding On 14 Sep 2017 11:52, "Wilk, Sebastian" <sebastian.w...@stud.hs-coburg.de> wrote: I am a bit puzzled about your last paragraph >We just use a v210 capture ->FFv1 ffmpeg transcode with losslessness >verification via framemd5 though. Is there a specific reason(s) for the capture step at the beginning? To my understanding I could use Ffmpeg just like any other Encoder (Handbrake) to convert my files, or am I missing something? By capture I meant migration a videotape to a digital file. Currently, we capture videotape signals as uncompressed 10bit v210 files. It's this file that we transcode to FFV1. Does that make sense? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
