2019-02-02 21:22 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de>: > > Am 02.02.19 um 02:18 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> Second: >> libx264 does support interlaced encoding (but not field (It appears as if you didn't read this sentence: It does not mean "you can feed anything into libx264, it will somehow deal with it", it means "libx264 does support interlaced encoding") >> encoding because it does not help encoding efficiency). >> >> Apart from that, it does severely hurt compressibility >> if you don't set interlaced encoding for interlaced content. > > ... what only is available for _some_ encoders as you > have stated, and libx264 seems not to have that. libx264 was by far the most advanced encoder until a very short time ago and is still among the best encoders available, of course it supports interlaced encoding, as explicitly stated above. It does not support field-encoding but as said, this - according to the x264 developers - doesn't help anyway. (The H.264 specification identifies two different methods for encoding interlaced video.) Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
