Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 22:00 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak <[email protected]>: > > On 01/26/2020 03:50 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:19 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak > > <[email protected]>: > > > >> On 01/26/2020 03:03 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>> Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak > >>> <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>> For soft telecined videos, all frames have > >>>> 'progressive_frame' = 1 > >>> > >>> I may miss something but since FFmpeg does not "support" soft-telecine > >>> why should there be an interlaced frame? > >> > >> Yes, ffmpeg does not make soft telecined streams. However, the soft > >> telecined videos are inputs, not outputs. > > > > I don't think FFmpeg "supports" soft-telecined input streams. > > At least not in the way once opon a time defined in an ancient NTSC > > standard... > > You are confusing soft telecine with hard telecine.
I thought you are... (hard-telecine encoding and decoding is - of course - supported by FFmpeg) > Since autumn 1999, nearly 100% of all region 1 DVDs are > soft telecined And such dvds are progressive if you don't watch on an (American) crt tv ... > so, of course, ffmpeg supports soft-telecined inputs. ... which you cannot use with FFmpeg - FFmpeg therefore will ignore soft-telecine (not "support" it). Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
