Jim DeLaHunt (12020-03-01): > I stand by my underlying observation, even if your situation is not a case > in point. There are plenty of other examples, and I have had direct > communications from contributors acknowledging the problem. The FFmpeg > project includes rude and hostile behaviour, and that has consequences — > that possible contributors are less likely to turn their good intentions > into patches to the code and documentation of ffmpeg.
I think your intervention would have been more efficient if you had chosen to make it in direct response to one of these rude behaviors. The best way to force things to evolve for the good is to step in when they are specifically bad. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
