On Sunday, 29 November 2020, 15:55:29 GMT, Michael Koch
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The name "feedback" is misleading because this signal isn't going back.> It
> would make sense to rename "feedback" to "wet".> What's now "wet" could be
> renamed "gain", or it could be removed because > it's unnecessary.
I may not be fully comprehending the behaviour of the software in this case,
but if your diagram is accurate that would make sense. Certainly it would
reflect the meaning of the terms "dry" and "wet" as they're commonly used in
audio processing. Using those terms in another way is confusing.
P
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
