On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:59:16 +0200 Richard Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 09:22, Tollef Fog Heen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think it makes sense to require applications to not assume that > > the contents are persistent across reboots. This does not tie the > > hands of distributions, but require that using a tmpfs (or similar) > > will work. > > I was about to suggest the same. +1. Seems sensible, I'll support that :) kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
