> On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:59:16 +0200 Richard Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 09:22, Tollef Fog Heen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I think it makes sense to require applications to not assume that >> > the contents are persistent across reboots. This does not tie the >> > hands of distributions, but require that using a tmpfs (or similar) >> > will work. >> >> I was about to suggest the same. +1. And so do I. It really seems to be a good choice to me.
Johan Commelin _______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
