On Wed, 18 May 2011 10:40:11 -0400 Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 12:04 PM, Julian Fagir wrote: > >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Tony Travis wrote: > >> if we want to get BSD people back into the FHS then i think an > >> attempt should be made to merge this into the FHS. at least the > >> non-conflicting parts for start. > > > > this request was already made: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2011-May/011439.html > > The NetBSD-mailing list had a longer discussion about that: > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-userlevel/2011/05/10/msg005050.html > > OpenBSD was involved as well: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=130499860531930&w=4 Hi Jeff, Thanks for taking the time to contact them all (and in some cases take some rather short remarks from posters) > The conclusion, all around, was that *BSD wasn't interested in the > FHS. While thats probably a fair assessment, there was a number of interesting points raised (ranging from HEIR 7 through to whether some of the required programs really are required). Did you note down any of the points raised? Should i open a trivial bug with the links above and someone can look at it 'in the future'? thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fhs-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/fhs-discuss
