At 02:59 AM 3/17/01 -0700, you wrote:
>I personally LOVED the R. Buchanan article - if you take it for what I did.
>It freed me like EZ freed me with knitting. . Keep the true woolen and
>worsted yarns for what they are - but since they are rarely produced as they
>should be, drop the labels when they don't fit.
Thanks, you said it the way I had meant to.
>Ah,the cover sweater. No offense, I adore EZ and she gave my knitting new
>life, and have followed much of what Meg does and have some of her books,
>but that sweater was in my opinion, just a nice sweater. (Wonderful
>spinning no matter what you think of the sweater.) Meg is a BIG name so she
>gets the cover,
Just for the heck of it I took out a couple of past years' issues. Deb
Metz's fish were an example of a finished item but the rest were pictures
of yarns, fibers, tools, etc. But the one just before the last also showed
a person wearing an item made from handspun - a young girl in a cap.
Obviously the new editor is changing from the covers showing the various
fibers we use to examples of what we make. I think that in light of
several good articles (I am going to make pillowcases) inside we ought not
to "judge the book by its cover".
Brucie
The true mystery of the world is the visible, not the invisible.
Oscar Wilde
To stop mail temporarily mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the message: set nomail To restore send: set mail
