Phil O'Brien said: >We have a Kodak RFS 3600 - and are not impressed. Burns out highlights - >and each image seems to be sharpened even with sharpening off. Will wait to >see if there are any software upgrades that get over this. I found with the RFS that careful choice of input and output profiles makes a noticeable difference in scan quality. I haven't noticed the sharpening problem though. Despite the problems I had with this scanner when it first arrived I find it to a pleasure to work with. The color accuracy from negatives is more than I hoped for. Paul >>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<< http://okphoto.webjump.com P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876 >>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<
- filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I need? Dave Suurballe
- RE: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... shAf
- RE: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... Sumtingwong
- RE: filmscanners: Do any scanners have wha... Bob & Glenna Marin
- RE: filmscanners: Do any scanners have... Sumtingwong
- Re: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... Herm
- Re: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... Arthur Entlich
- RE: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... Phil O'Brien
- RE: filmscanners: Do any scanners have what I ... Clark Guy
- Re: filmscanners: Do any scanners have wha... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Do any scanners have wha... photoscientia
