> In other words number of > bits does NOT define Dmax, it only defines what the best possible might > be. Absolutely correct! It is but one piece of the system, and the system is only as good as its worst part.
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Hersch Nitikman
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Mike Kersenbrock
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Julian Robinson
- RE: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Bob Shomler
- Re: filmscanners: Re: So it's t... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmsca... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Robert E. Wright
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Tony Sleep
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... photoscientia
- RE: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Austin Franklin
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... photoscientia
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... Julian Robinson
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: fil... bjs
- Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sp... photoscientia
- RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 now on B+H web site ... Frank Paris
