Re: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 nowon B+H web

[Robert E. Wright]

Finally!?
----- Original Message -----
From: Austin Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 nowon B+H
web


>
> > In other words number of
> > bits does NOT define Dmax, it only defines what the best possible might
> > be.
>
> Absolutely correct!  It is but one piece of the system, and the system is
> only as good as its worst part.
>
>
>