At 09:14 15/01/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Gee, for someone accusing another of "sounding like a US Lawyer", I
>believe you are the first person I've encountered on the internet who
>feels the need to protect their name with a registered trademark.
>
>Further, since this is a filmscanner group, it doesn't strike me as odd at
>all that people discuss film (negative or positive) in terms of how it
>relates to film scanners rather than photographic paper emulsions.
>
>Art
Art, it's partly joke, partly protection against spammers.
we share our hobby between good old photography and the new digital form.
lateral thinking is not prohibited yet :-{)
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
