At 01:47 19/01/2001 -0800, you wrote: >>Tell you what, now we have superior technology, perhaps we should revisit >>the early colour technique of making 3 exposures onto monochrome pan >>film, via tri-cut RGB filters. Lots of effort, but no mask! It should be >>easy to register the scans afterwards in PS. > >Isn't this basically kodachrome but with three separate frames per image.;-) I would say, Technicolor "Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia".
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Raphael Bustin
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Tony Sleep
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
- RE: filmscanners: orange mask Laurie Solomon
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: orange mask Roman Kielich�
