Thanks for that, Ed. I figured I must be the only one who thought that was the case.. To be honest I've never used it to help with overexposed negs/ undexposed slides because my Acer has no trouble with these - from conversations with other Acer users, I suspect either my lamp is particularly bright :) or the unit is calibrated differently to most. I only have real trouble with noise and g-a in the light areas of film, so it doesn't help me much. Mark T. At 12:22 PM 21/07/01 -0400, Ed wrote: >My experience has been that multiscanning doesn't help >underexposed negatives at all, but instead is only >marginally useful for overexposed negatives and underexposed >slides. It primarily helps get detail from dark areas on the film.
- Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners: Vuescan... S. Matthew Prastein
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Jeffrey Goggin
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscan... S. Matthew Prastein
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscan... S. Matthew Prastein
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... EdHamrick
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Mark T.
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- RE: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Frank Nichols
- re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Alan Womack
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... EdHamrick
- re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- RE: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Frank Nichols
- filmscanners: Umax banding tflash
- RE: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen