> This is an ungrateful thing to say, but in respect to the Acer, I get > somewhat darker scans on *underexposed* negs with the native Mira driver. > That's because the Vuescan driver (at least the way I've been using > it--which is seat-of-the-pants flying, BTW) seems to give a > slightly longer > exposure than the Mira. This is *great* for underexposed slides and > overexposed negs, however, which is where most of my problems are. > > Best regards--LRA Lynn, I don't think VS controls exposure time on Scanwits directly - they have an autoexposure system with "no" manual control. However, I agree it appears something Ed is doing appears to result in longer exposures. It would be interesting to know how this happens - maybe Ed could jump in with a theory/explanation? /fn
- Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners: Vuescan... S. Matthew Prastein
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Jeffrey Goggin
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscan... S. Matthew Prastein
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Rob Geraghty
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscan... S. Matthew Prastein
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... EdHamrick
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Mark T.
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Frank Nichols
- re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Alan Womack
- Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... EdHamrick
- re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen
- RE: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Frank Nichols
- filmscanners: Umax banding tflash
- RE: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners... Lynn Allen