At 19:11 12-08-01 +0100, David Gordon wrote: >rlb [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2001 07:31:43 -0400 > > >I would appreciate some thoughts from those that use Silverfast. > >It has a very steep learning curve. It is hard to use. It is unintuitive. >It has a very poor user interface. > >It make fantastic scans in two minutes. > >Get the IT-8 calibration, try the demo first! Been there. Did that. On my Win2K system the SIlverfast demo made NikonScan inoperative. I had to uninstall Silverfast and reinstall NikonScan before it would work again. Not sure about the fantastic scans part but you nailed it in other areas. Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia http://www.enochsvision.com/, http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- "Behind all these manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through all things. The function of art is to reveal this radiance through the created object." ~Joseph Campbell
Re: filmscanners: Silverfast vs Nikon Software?
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) Sun, 12 Aug 2001 13:46:04 -0700
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast vs Nik... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfa... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfa... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- RE: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Shough, Dean