At 13:17 14-08-01 +0000, you wrote: >Cary wrote: >>This technique can help many balky applications to run correctly on Win2K. > >This (below) sounds like a good answer to a bad problem. Before I try it >on my next install, though, has anyone here tried this type of "custom >installation" on Win98? The technique probably won't work on Windows 98 or NT either because it takes advantage of a feature of Windows 2000's System File Protection. It may work on X-pee and possibly on Windows Me but I haven't seen any documentation to that effect. http://windows2000.about.com/compute/windows2000/library/tips/bltip228.htm >>This technique can help many balky applications to run correctly on Win2K. Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia http://www.enochsvision.com/, http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- "Behind all these manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through all things. The function of art is to reveal this radiance through the created object." ~Joseph Campbell
Re: filmscanners: Silverfast vs Nikon Software?
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:07:11 -0700
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast vs Nik... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... RogerMillerPhoto
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Lynn Allen
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfa... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- Re: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Lynn Allen
- RE: filmscanners: Silverfa... Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
- RE: filmscanners: Silverfast v... Shough, Dean