Pat writes ... > Keep in mind that just because a sensor is smaller > than 24x36mm doesn't make your lenses obsolete. It > makes them telephoto, ... I think a better description of how a small CCD uses a 35mm lens, is "as if you used a 'doubler' or 'tripler'" with the lens. What you get is the lens resolution associated with only using part of its field-of-view. Most would claim this is not a significant issue with Nikkor lenses and only 6M pixels. I also cannot imagine a smaller CCD benefitting from all the light gathering ... I rather imagine the D1 firmware compensating. It would be intersting to compare the EXIF acquisition data with the appropriate exposure settings for the same lens and 35mm film. shAf :o)
- filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mark T.
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Pat Perez
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X shAf
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X bob geoghegan
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal