----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Greenbank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 6:26 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Meier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:47 PM > Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X > > > > Or another way to look at it is that you just crop the inner part of a > > 35mm frame. In other words, you are using just parts of what your 35mm > > lens covers. That means you have lots of glass (the area increases with > > the square of the radius) that you waste. > > But you do have the advantage that the centre is invariably sharper, often > much sharper, than the edge. > > Steve > > I forgot any nasty lens distortion is usually concentrated at the edges. Steve
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X John Straus
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Pat Perez
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X shAf
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X bob geoghegan
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Johnny Deadman