Maybe I'm not looking at the images correctly but the _entire_ Nikon 4000 frame looks out of focus. Is this a fair test - to compare an out-of-focus Nikon scan to an in-focus Canon scan?
Brian -------------------------------------------------------------- respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mikael Risedal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000 > > To illustrate what I mean with poor Nikon Ls 4000 sharpness, I have > put a attachment with a jpg file. Vuescan as a reference sofware and same > settings to the 2 scanners > > > > >Nikon Ls 4000 can not produce equal sharpness over the whole film area if > >the film are mounted glass less or in a filmstrip. Lack of depth of field. > > > >The test shows that a combination of Canons sharpness and Nikons scanning > >speed, colors and Dmax should be a nearly perfect mid end scanner. > > > >Mikael Risedal > > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >
