If Mikael is not in USA, I can only hope the country where he bought it is as cooperative as I have found NikonUSA.
They have somebody in 'quality control' supposedly go over the repairs before they are shipped out. I have found that to be their weak link, as the first time I sent my LS-30 in for an intermittent banding problem, it also had a focus problem. I got approval for a priority return shipping at their expense, and their return invoice stated they had replaced the focus motor... Anyway, it worked fine when I got it back the 2nd time, except the intermittent banding problem later returned. That time, they sent me a 'new' replacement scanner.
Hersch
At 02:32 PM 11/15/2001, you wrote:
Maybe I'm not looking at the images correctly but the _entire_ Nikon 4000
frame looks out of focus. Is this a fair test - to compare an out-of-focus
Nikon scan to an in-focus Canon scan?
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mikael Risedal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
>
> To illustrate what I mean with poor Nikon Ls 4000 sharpness, I have
> put a attachment with a jpg file. Vuescan as a reference sofware and same
> settings to the 2 scanners
>
>
>
> >Nikon Ls 4000 can not produce equal sharpness over the whole film area
if
> >the film are mounted glass less or in a filmstrip. Lack of depth of
field.
> >
> >The test shows that a combination of Canons sharpness and Nikons
scanning
> >speed, colors and Dmax should be a nearly perfect mid end scanner.
> >
> >Mikael Risedal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
