I wish they'd set the reply-to: back . . . At 04/25/2002 05:57 AM, Dennis W. Manasco wrote:
>Think of it this way: Suppose you had a Windows machine with three >hard disks. On one disk you might have three "Windows" folders: >Windows 98, Windows XP and Windows 95. On the second disk you might >have just one "Windows" folder (though for consistency I think I have >to make this a Linux boot folder...). On disk three you have a >"Windows" folder for Windows 3.x and yet another "Windows" folder >which was a copy of Windows 98, but one which no installer had ever >perverted by modifying its registry and stuffing messed-up DLLs down >its throat. That's almost the way it works. There is a limitation for OS before WinNT, that they have to be on the C: drive. So Win3.1, Win95, and Win98 would have to be in subdirectories on the C: drive. WinNT, Win2000 and WinXP could be on other drives, in other subdirectories. >Now imagine that you could choose any one of them as your >boot system and that, no matter what you installed or messed about >with while under a particular system, only your boot system would be >affected -- all of the others would remain as they were. Yes, that's how it works on Windows. I don't think I got what your point was? Phil Daley < AutoDesk > http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
