At 12:26 pm +0200 5/9/02, Jari Williamsson wrote:

>David H. Bailey writes:
>
>>I can't understand a program which WOULDN'T do things that way -- 
>>why would anybody layout a page in landscape and then try to print 
>>it in portrait?

>2-up printing for example.

This is a printer driver problem rather than a screen-orientation 
versus page-orientation problem within the program. I believe it was 
solved long ago. All of the postscript drivers I've used on the Mac 
in years allow you to set up a layout for multiple pages per sheet. I 
believe the PC drivers do as well, but I never have reason to use 
this with them. Set Page Setup to portrait, set Print>Layout to Pages 
per sheet: 2, and you have 2-up landscape printing.

At 1:48 pm +0200 5/9/02, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

>It's not so much whether portrait of landscape mode are matched, but 
>whether the application allows you to have an independent page 
>format from the printers page size. Otherwise Finale's options for 
>crop marks would be completely useless since these have to be placed 
>outside the layout page.

This is a margin dichotomy rather than an orientation dichotomy. 
Crop/registration marks are intended to be printed outside the page's 
user-selected margins. I don't think that anyone would argue that 
Finale's margins should be defined by the printable margins of the 
paper. If I want to set a 3" x 5" page on a portrait 8 1/2 x 11 page 
there should be nothing in the margin assignments of the program that 
stops me from doing so.

The assertion was about the synchronization of page _orientations_. 
It makes little sense to print crop/registration marks for a portrait 
page on a landscape page.

As an aside, I have used PageMaker for many years and have never had 
a page layout print in an orientation other than the one I was 
viewing on the screen.

At 8:30 am -0400 5/9/02, David H. Bailey wrote:

>As it is, since we are concurrently discussing making Finale more 
>out-of-the-box user-friendly, if a newbie tries to set things up for 
>landscape mode in page layout and then prints without realizing that 
>he really hasn't told the printer anything and the program defaults 
>to portrait mode in the printer setup, the printout will not be 
>correct.

This problem bit me many times when I was first learning Finale. I 
spent a lot of time cursing and obsessively checking settings. 
Changing page _orientation_ in one dialog and not having it reflected 
in the other (really far away and relatively hidden) dialog really is 
a situation which will have a new user wanting to punch through his 
screen and strangle the program.

At 4:52 pm +0200 5/9/02, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

>3) It would not work to use Finale's Score format to make the 
>appropriate settings in the printer's page format, since some 
>printers don't support all page formats you could possibly set. What 
>will you do if you receive a complete score from someone else set to 
>A3, but your printer doesn't support A 3?

If the necessary change is from Ax to American ratios the only choice 
would be to reduce-to-fit on the longest dimension and reduce the 
size of the entire page. Vice-versa on the shortest dimension for 
American sizes to Ax. What if someone sent you a 6" x 9" page and you 
wanted to print it out on paper that was 4" x 7" ?

I hate to disagree with Jari and Johannes. They have so many more 
hours with Finale than I do that I feel I must be missing something, 
but I cannot see any reason why a choice for _page_orientation_ 
should not be consistently reflected throughout the program.


Best wishes,

-=-Dennis





-- 
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to