At 6:41 AM 07/12/02, David H. Bailey wrote: >No, he is not, but he IS the only representative of the engraver's art >who was willing to go public with his art, so we have only the engraved >music from the other engravers to go by (as is brought up often in this >list) as either supporting evidence, or refuting evidence.
Fair enough. Good for him, for putting himself on the spot like that. But that doesn't mean we have to go easy on him when he states a rule that many disagree with. >And we don't >have the engraver's opinion as to what was done being good engraving or >if it was simply following a misguided editor/boss's ideas. It's not clear to me that the editor is more likely to be misguided than the engraver. mdl _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
