At 9:28 AM +0900 7/13/02, Richard Walker wrote:
>Here are some ideas off the top of my head that I would like to see Finale,
>Sibelius, another notation program, or a clever plug-in developer (hint,
>hint) implement:
>
>1. Linkage between scores and extracted parts. If I update one, the other
>should be updated automatically. Ideally, extracted parts could be viewed in
>some sort of pop-up window from the main score--triple click an instrument
>name and its part comes up for editing.


Hmm. Intelligent idea (I think David has been talking about this for 
while now), but I'm not sure I'd like it. It always makes me queasy 
when the program gets smarter than I am, and starts second-guessing 
me at every turn. I think I might like my edits to stay in the file 
that I make them in. I can always easily copy them back to the score 
(and often do) using the mass mover, if I need them there.



>2. Intelligent chord explosion. Currently, if you want to voice sections
>without switching from staff to staff, you have to create another staff,
>input your chords, articulations, and dynamics, and then "explode" them onto
>the real staves (or have I missed something?). I'd like to select a group of
>staves (say, a sax section), play a chord, and automatically have the notes
>divided up among the targets.


Finale already has this, though not the instant you play the chord 
in. There is an intermediate step, which is either Mass Mover>Explode 
parts, or else TG Tools smart part extraction, (the latter is 
preferred if you have a lot of unisons or octaves.) you don't have to 
create a new staff, simply enter the chords on Alto 1 and then 
explode them, they will fill up the staves immediately beneath, and 
leave the top note happily on Alto 1.


>3. "Section views." In line with the chord explosion technique above (more
>like carpet bombing really), I'd like a function that would toggle sections
>between one or two concert staves and individual part staves: i.e., press a
>key and the sax section collapses into two concert staves, press it again
>and you get all five staves.


This might be harder to implement than it seems. Where do you put the 
cross-over to decide which which staff gets which note? What about 
different rhythms? What would be done then? Not a bad idea, though.


>
>4. Intelligent guitar parts. If you have a chord symbol and a slash rhythm,
>you ought to hear a guitar playing it with no further effort on your part.
>Granted, the voicings might need tweaking.


There is a lot that could be done with the Band In A Box technology 
in Finale. I suspect that better implementation is just around the 
corner.

BTW, I HATE the auto harmonise function, as it gives results that 
even Schönberg would wince at. THere is another program for the Mac 
called Harmonis by my colleague Richard Ferland which is ever so much 
better. Maybe I could slip a message...


>
>6. Shortcuts for common transpositions. Sibelius does this very well.
>Shift-up arrow transposes up an octave, shift-down arrow goes down an
>octave. Need a coupling in diatonic thirds? Press shift-3 (main keyboard).
>Fourths? Press shift-4.


Mass mover has some metatools for this. 6 and 7 are constantly 
assigned to octave up and down, and I reserve some other keys for 
common transpositions as I need them. This already exists in Finale.


>
>
>8.5 Automatic cues. Like above. I should be able to link cue notes to the
>staves on which they appear, but also continue to be able to edit the target
>staff.


Once again, I point you to TG Tools, which has the best automatic cue 
note creation I could ever want.


>
>
>11. Menu or keyboard access to all functions. Things that can only be
>clicked on are almost impossible to macro-ize.


Oh yeah. I hear you, baby. Though Tempo EZ, my incredibly ancient 
macro program, recognizes items to click on, and if all else fails, 
remembers the coordinates where I clicked. Just the same, more 
keyboard access to menu items would help me quite a bit. I know Peter 
will chime in here that it won't help me as much as I think it will, 
but it would make me happy, (even if it only makes me marginally 
faster or not at all) and that's what counts, isn't it? Happiness?
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to