Harold,

I do and don't agree with you.  When I want to make a nice MIDI demo of a
piece I notated in Finale, I certainly export the MIDI into Digital
Performer, or some other sequencer and do it there.  And, likewise, I don't
use Performer for notation.

However, Finale _already has_ a thorough MIDI implementation that is useful
to many people (including myself) for a variety of reasons--most of which
involve playback of the score while it is in process.  The problem is that
it is buggy and not always easy to use.  If the interface for modification
of MIDI data were simpler and more reliable, then I suspect all of
us--including those whose focus is on notation output--would make better use
of it.

Even (as someone else mentioned) a mixer window with recordable controls for
volume, pan, key velocities, etc. seems to be something that would be easily
added.  This seems like it would be much less involved than my ideas
involving graphical representation of data overlaying the score.

And if Coda wanted to go further and add humanizing options and the like, I
say that's great, because that could be useful to Finale.

I think we might agree on things that aren't useful for Finale to try to do,
like loop-based recording, arpeggiating effects, movie import, SMPTE
support, and hundreds of other things that sequencers do.

I don't think Finale should try to become a MIDI sequencer on the level of
Performer and Logic, but since it already _is_ a MIDI sequencer, then I see
no harm in asking for the implementation to be improved.  I suspect Coda has
programmers working specifically in that area, and they need suggestions
too!

Tim Thompson

Harold Steinhardt wrote:

> Exactly!  Finale is a NOTATION program with rudimentary midi
> capabilities - it is not a sequencer.  When you want minute detail over midi
> playback, dump the midi data to a program designed to do that, like
> Logic or Performer.
> 
> Use the right tool for the right job.
> 
> All this complaining about midi in Finale is like MS Word users
> complaining that they can't easily produce their magazine layout in Word.
> 
> Please, Coda, do not waste your precious resources on added midi
> (except to get basic midi functioning in OSX).  Keep improving the
> notational aspects of the program for which it was designed.

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to