I can hear a piece in my head. I know how it sounds. Then I have it played by
humans. There is a slight change in the music. The players bring in another
ingredient. I get used to it. Then you play the piece in front of an audience
and it becomes "another ball game".
It's like hearing music or watching alone. You know the music and you know
the movie. Then you hear it or see it with someone else. It's different.

I don't want to criticize anyone's way of doing things. This is my way only.

Regards:

Bob Florence

Chuck Israels wrote:

> At 11:56 PM -0400 7/16/02, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> >At 2:21 PM -0500 7/16/02, Harold Steinhardt wrote:
> >>
> >>If an arranger or a composer does not know what it will sound like
> >>BEFORE notating it, then they do not know their art/craft very well.  If
> >>they don't already know what it will sound like, how do they
> >>determine what to write in the first place?
> >
> >
> >Hmm, I don't think I am completely in agreement with that statement.
> >No less an authority than Bob Brookmeyer said (paraphrased) "I never
> >know exactly what one of my pieces will sound like. If I did, I
> >wouldn't bother writing it, cause what's the use if I already know?
> >I only know what it will sound like if I've already written
> >something pretty much like it already, and I'm not into repeating
> >myself."
>
> My compositions seem to me to be something like the script of a play.
> I need to proofread them with midi playback, (at least that is a
> helpful exercise), but until there is the interaction of my
> "instructions" with human players, their directed interaction with
> each other, the effect of the whole thing on listeners, and the
> feedback loop that comes from the musicians perceiving the effect on
> the listeners, it remains something like hearing a typewriter read a
> script.  I never confuse it with music, nor do I depend on it for
> anything having to do with balance or color.  I have no quarrel with
> those who do, and I'd probably go for some of that if I could control
> it more easily in a way that would resemble the eventual result
> reliably.  But I just check pitch and rhythm (with a piano sound) and
> force my memory for real music to do the rest.  If my pitch memory
> were more reliable, maybe I'd be able to forgo playback entirely, but
> the truth is I've become dependent on it ever since I started using
> Finale, and it's hard to conceive of going back to working without
> it.  (I have limited keyboard skills.)  That's my story, and I'm
> sticking with it (for the time being).
>
> Chuck
> --
> Chuck Israels
> 230 North Garden Terrace
> Bellingham  WA 98225-5836
> (360) 671-3402  fax (360) 676-6055
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to