Also, NI just came out with the first Mac version of their Kontakt sampler, and it only runs in 9.
But if it is so difficult, then why are there other products that make it seem so easy? Check out www.intuem.com. Perhaps it is not so difficult to build a X native midi program from the ground up as it is to port years of pre-X (midi and other) programming to X. I sure hope that both MOTU and CODA are taking so much time because they see an opportunity to thoroughly rebuild the product! --or am I na�ve? Tim David Bailey wrote: > I get the feeling that creating working MIDI applications in native OSx > mode might be far more difficult than any of us imagine. Sort of like > the problems everybody ran into with WindowsNT and Windows2000. Of > course, it might not be anything like that, it just might have the > APPEARANCE of similarity to the likes of me. > > But when two major music applications don't provide native OSx support, > I begin to think it is harder than imagined and perhaps that is why > Apple bought Emagic -- to help them not alienate the music community > further, as they did with the first release of OSX. > > > > Rocky Road wrote: >> They finally updated it to version eleven (from ver. eight I think) >> >> But guess what - no OSX (only classic). >> >> Who brings out a new version at this point with no OSX? Its been sitting >> on v.8 for a couple of years now - why didn't they just wait? >> > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
