On 30.05.2003 22:43 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

> Another interesting thing about this manuscript is that Bach very
> selectively inserts additional flats or sharps on accidentals that are
> repeated within lengthy and complex measures.

This is just normal 18th century practice - the rule that an accidental
lasts for one measure is more recent than Bach's manuscripts.

> Every edition I'd seen
> has eliminated these, presumably on grounds of modern practice or
> house style.

It is simply a translation of old style standards into modern standards. You
wouldn't expect to see a sharp sign indicating a naturalized flat in a
modern edition either, would you? Yet this was standard even in Bach's
manuscripts until about 1714 (the unaccompnied manuscript is 1720, by which
time Bach had adopted natural signs).


>  That seems to me an unwarranted change to the composer's
> text, since Bach apparently thought they were worth inserting.

It actually has nothing to do with Bach wanting to make anything clearer. It
was simply standard practice.

> When
> sightreading, or playing relatively unfamiliar slow movements, I too
> think they're worthwhile.  Is there an edition that simply reproduces
> that lovely manuscript in clear print, as closely as it can be
> deciphered, right down to omitting the last flat in minor key
> signatures?

This detail of "Dorian" key signatures is reproduced in several editions (eg
Henle). The extra accidentals are not reproduced in any edition I know of,
but I wouldn't expect to see them either (if you would consider this
necessary almost any modern edition of 18th century music would have to be
changed - standard practice is to translate these notational standard's
differences into modern practice even in the strictest Urtext). What does
the old Bach Gesamtausgabe do?

>  *That* would be an "Urtext"!  (I suppose I could sit down
> to Finale and make my own, given a week or more of free time...)

Making a real Urtext of the Bach unaccompanied is probably a good test for
any notation programme, but a rather time consuming one as well.

BTW, if you read German and are interested I could send you an article about
the Bach unaccompanied I wrote 6 years ago. It deals mainly with the direct
history of the set, not so much with notational details.

Greetings
Johannes

-- 
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to