On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:30:08 -0500, "Darcy James Argue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On 25 Mar 2004, at 07:01 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> 
> > However, when Sib3 saves files in Sib2 format, you lose all of the new 
> > features that Sib3 has initiated, such as colors that correspond to 
> > some school music instrument made out of colored tubes that kids whack 
> > when they see that colored note.  So you can create a beautiful score 
> > in Sib3 with everything you want, save it in Sib2 format to send to a 
> > buddy for additional editing, and when they send that Sib2 file back 
> > to you with the changes, you have to go right back and re-edit all 
> > that colored stuff you originally worked so hard to get just right.
> 
> Well, of course.  How else could it be?  It's still far better than 
> having no backwards compatibility at all, IMO.

All my students use Sibelius FWIW- it really does seem to have cornered
the market here in the UK, I think. Last week, one of them sent a Sib
File to me, but it was Sib 3, so I couldn't open it. (I have the demo for
2 on my mac, but as it only runs 8.6, I can't use the Sib 3 demo.) I
emailed him back, and he replied 'no problem' and sent it as a Sib 2
file. I found that very impressive.

David
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to