On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote: > I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want my > notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things: 1. layout in the linked part would not be as fully adjustable as layout in an extracted part. 2. the implementation of such a feature would be accompanied by the removal of the current part extraction capability. Why is it that whenever someone proposes what are obvious changes to Finale that would make it much, much easier to use that so many people argue against the change on the grounds that it would be implemented in the most stupid fashion imaginable? -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
