For the past 25 years I have found the following to be a very comfortable way
of looking at the matter:

In all civilizations, music tends to sort out into three streams, folk, popular, and
classical. 

Folk music is the music of the countryside; its creators and performers
are non-professional and musically illiterate, and individual works can seldom be
assigned to a single identifiable individual.

Popular music is the music of the whole urban population. Its creators are 
identified, and its performers are professionals, though they need not be
highly trained. NB: after rural electrification, folk music becomes a fossil and
pop holds equal sway in both the city and the country. (Modern "folk" musicians
are really making popular music in imitation of folk styles)

Classical music is the music of the intelligentsia, that subset of the urban
population who crave music that demands and rewards intense and prolonged
concentration. Its creators and performers are alike highly trained professionals,
and occupy a considerably higher social stratum than other musicians in the
same culture. 

Because it is by definition a minority taste, classical music can never depend 
entirely upon its audience for economic support. The music must in addition
seek the patronage of the upper strata of society, who may be totally indifferent
to the music (as was, e.g., JFK) yet will support it because they understand the
importance of keeping the intelligentsia happy. It is not correct to say, as is so 
often casually
asserted, that classical music is the music of the upper class. In the radio industry, 
conventional wisdom states that the core audience for any classical radio station
consists of "doctors, lawyers, teachers, and musicians"--not, that is to say, the
top layer of society, but one just below it, where society's brain-workers reside.

In the West, as elsewhere, this has always been the case. Mediaeval classical music, 
for example,
was created by and for the clergy--who comprised virtually the entire literate segment 
of
society. Nor was this the music of popes and cardinals, but of a broad cross-section 
of clerical
music-lovers. Bach wrote his cantatas for the churchgoers of Leipzig. Opera from the 
very
first was open to anyone who could afford a ticket--nor was a princely sum charged for 
such. 
And so on.

Now, as to things like film music. It should be evident that the borders between 
classical and pop are not fixed 
but flexible, with a large gray area in between of "light classics," "serious pop," 
and so on. Music in this area
may well find acceptance among both audiences--and it is important to remember too 
that the classical
audience is a *subset* of the pop audience, not separate from it.

--Andrew Stiller
Kallisti Music Press
http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to