Absolutely agree. I think hymnbook style is appropriate for (mostly) homophonic 
music. But I see music where the Sops and Altos have quite different rhythms 
and lines, (sometimes even with a lot of the Sops crossing below the Altos), 
and it's notated in one staff. It's hard to sightread, and takes up rehearsal 
time.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, December 20, 2004 1:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Finale] The state of the art: a report from the trenches

> At 10:27 AM -1000 12/20/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >There is also a fair amount of scoring SATB as SA and TB where it 
> >really ought to be split into 4 staves. *sigh*
> 
> Well, that's hymnbook style as opposed to choral score style.  I 
> use 
> both, as appropriate.  Specifically, when I'm writing for someone 
> and 
> I will not be there to clarify things, or writing for publication 
> (which I'd love to do more of!), I will use 4 staves because 
> that's 
> expected.  But there's a problem with that when it comes to 
> divisi. 
> If I want to go from SA to SSA or SAA, I have to put the third 
> note 
> on either the soprano staff or the alto staff.  But what I might 
> actually intend is SMA, with equal numbers of sopranos, mezzos and 
> altos, and I always wonder whether the average choir director will 
> take that into consideration.  (One of my faculty colleagues at 
> Indiana University assigned the women in his ensemble to S1, S2, 
> and 
> A, but then had all S1s and S2s sing the soprano line when the 
> voicing was SATB, giving a soprano-heavy sound I didn't especially 
> care for.)
> 
> Writing for my own college groups, though, in pop styles that were 
> mostly homorhythmic, I used 2 staves, SA and TB.  This allowed me 
> to 
> go from unison on each staff to 2-part to 3-part to 4-part very 
> easily, and I did quite a lot of that.  If I got into contrapuntal 
> passages, of course I switched to as many staves as there were 
> parts. 
> It never seemed to bother my students (the men) to switch from 
> tenor 
> G-clef to bass clef in the middle of a chart when it was 
> necessary. 
> And when I sent out acceptance letters before the start of fall 
> semester, I included a chart specifying which part each singer was 
> to 
> sing in 2-, 3-, or 4-part divisi.
> 
> Editing for my early music ensemble, I make the barlines invisible 
> when the music seems to need it, and my singers have gotten used 
> to 
> it and are less locked into barline rhythms and more likely to 
> shape 
> their phrases according to the text accentuation.  But again, I'm 
> in 
> charge of those rehearsals and can clarify any questions.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> -- 
> John & Susie Howell
> Virginia Tech Department of Music
> Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
> Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> 

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to