On 6 Feb 2005 at 15:26, Andrew Stiller wrote: > >And when you eliminate the concept of dissonance in the musical text > >(i.e., the dissonances are never resolved), -- > David W. Fenton > > I'm sorry, but this literally makes no sense as formulated, and there > have clearly been several logical steps omitted. > > Let's do it this way: I deny what you say. Now prove it.
That's a standard debating tactic when you have no argument: to pretend that someone *else* has introduced the conflict to the discussion. *You* started this, not me. You prove *your* assertion that, in effect, consonance can exist in music in which "dissonance" is never resolved. I've no interest in playing your childish debating games. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
