> > > >> I don't think ethical refusal to accept victimware is neglect. My > > > >> and my clients' scores are too important to me to entrust to a > > > >> corporation's ill will > > > > > > > > I think you're arguing along your own agenda regardless of what I > > > > write. > > > > > > You used the pejorative "neglect" to promote your agenda > > > > I don't really have an agenda on this issue, although I don't > > subscribe to your victimware POV. > > The point is that Dennis's reasons for not upgrading are rational, > not, as you said, due to some form of "neglect."
Don't get hung up on "neglect", it was used loosely, you probably didn't read to the end of that particular email - it was just stream of counciousness typing :) I don't care which version people use as it doesn't affect me in the least (yet). I was however _fascinated_ in the topic as some peoples relationships with their clients were very far removed from my own experience - Dennis and others have been talking about issues which simply haven't arisen for me in ten years in the business. -- Simon Troup Digital Music Art ------------------------- Finale IRC channel server: irc.chatspike.net port: 6667 channel: #Finale ------------------------- _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
