> > I was however _fascinated_ in the topic as some peoples > > relationships with their clients were very far removed from my own > > experience - Dennis and others have been talking about issues which > > simply haven't arisen for me in ten years in the business. > > Umm, like what? Just wondering.
Just the whole thing of why clients want access to the Finale files, what clients do with them, are engravers happy about giving them away, shouldn't engravers be doing any corrections and being paid for it, don't editors just mess things up if they play with the files ... > > I don't think ethical refusal to accept victimware is neglect. > > and I would suggest that it seems to me that Simon is characterizing > overlooking the failure to determine what version of Finale a client > is using before starting a project in which finale files might are to > be provided to the customer, as neglect. That was what I was suggesting when I was blathering on about my experience of owning Quark 4 when all the publishers were still on 3.3, I was presumed there had to be other reasons, a couple of good ones were quickly pointed out. -- Simon Troup Digital Music Art ------------------------- Finale IRC channel server: irc.chatspike.net port: 6667 channel: #Finale ------------------------- _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
