On 29 May 2005 at 3:12, John Bell wrote: > On 29 May 2005, at 02:50, Carl Dershem wrote: > > > When the benefits of upgrading are are slight as they often are > > with Finale upgrades, waiting two or three upgrades is by far the > > most efficient course of action. As long as I do not have $100 > > that is not better used elsewhere, and am getting good use of the > > version I have now, I see no need to pay for features I would not > > benefit $100 from. > > Yes of course, that's entirely up to you. But it seems to me that if > MM produces an upgrade involving new features and improvements in > existing elements then it is not unreasonable of them to ask for > payment. I always upgrade at the earliest opportunity and have never > regretted doing so.
No one, least of all me, has suggested anything remotely resembling the proposition that MakeMusic does not deserve to be paid for upgrades. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
