Ken,
Great work! Thanks for this; it is indeed point by point and extremely
detailed.
Of course, given the source, some points will bear confirmation, but it
was good to see someone who knows the present version of the program as
well as the older version give a reaction to the criticisms that have
been levied against Sibelius in the past.
Christopher
On Jul 13, 2005, at 8:33 PM, Ken Durling wrote:
Well, I, for one, would like to see a point-by-point response to each
of the items. Maybe somebody could do something like:
David -
I forwarded the list to someone at Sibelius as I had to work all day
today. here's a point-by-point response from the source:
Hi Ken,
Thanks for forwarding this to me. I'm sure I've seen this list
before. It's *incredibly* out of date. If you want to send this
response back to the folks on the Finale mailing list, go ahead.
(big snip!)
Daniel Spreadbury
Product Manager
--
Sibelius Software Ltd, 20-22 City North, Fonthill Road, London N4 3HF
Tel: +44 (0)20 7561 7999
Fax: +44 (0)20 7561 7888
Web: http://www.sibelius.com
London and San Francisco
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
