Yes, Mark. I quickly put a test file together yesterday, and entered two and three note chords with an accidental on each note. Each accidental on each chord could be moved independently of the other accidentals. How about that?
This test file should be virtual "out of the box" default Finale 2005a for the Mac. I guess my program options would be the main exception. I'd just like to know the factor in mac 2005 that allows the old, incorrect behavior. Then, maybe, I could still use my templates. Thanks, Don Hart on 7/21/05 1:47 AM, Mark D Lew at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:20 PM, Don Hart wrote: > >> I also changed Maestro to Petrucci in the test file that worked >> properly and >> it continued to be OK. > > What do you mean by "worked properly"? Are you saying that in another > file you can nudge the innermost accidental on a chord and the other > accidentals *don't* move? If so, that's a change from 2k2. > > Maybe they've changed the accidental placement algorithm so that it > takes fixed accidentals into account? (In which case my earlier > discussion is now obsolete.) > > Question for anyone out there who is current: If you have a simple > chord with two accidentals, and you use the special tool to nudge the > inner one, does the outer one then jump to become inner or doesn't it? > > mdl > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
