On 22 Jul 2005 at 16:27, Don Hart wrote:

> on 7/22/05 2:17 PM, David W. Fenton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > And I definitely believe that the "no female tenors" rule is more
> > justifiable than the "no countertenors singing alto" rule. The
> > former is, at least, historically appropriate.
> 
> So we can sexually discriminate based on a history determined by
> sexual discrimination?  

Er, it isn't sex discrimination.

> That might not hold up in a court of law.  ;-)

Only a court with a really stupid judge who couldn't tell the 
difference between valid qualifications for musical tasks and brain-
dead stupid fantasies about equality.

-- 
David W. Fenton                        http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associates                http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to